California bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
California SB 527
Worker classification: employees and independent contractors: athletic coaches.
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To Governor
- Became law
Sponsors
- Alvarado-Gil (Republican)
Cosponsors (6)
- Choi (Republican)
- Jones (Republican)
- Ochoa Bogh (Republican)
- Seyarto (Republican)
- Macedo (Republican)
- Wallis (Republican)
Summary
Official abstract published by the California legislature· summary
Existing law, as established in the case of Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903 (Dynamex) , creates a presumption that a worker who performs services for a hirer is an employee for purposes of claims for wages and benefits arising under wage orders issued by the Industrial Welfare Commission. Existing law requires a 3-part test, commonly known as the "ABC" test, to determine if workers are employees or independent contractors for those purposes.
Existing law establishes that, for purposes of the Labor Code, the Unemployment Insurance Code, and the wage orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission, a person providing labor or services for remuneration is considered an employee rather than an independent contractor unless the hiring entity demonstrates that the person is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, the person performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business, and the person is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business. This test is known as the "ABC" test, as described above. Existing law charges the Labor Commissioner with the enforcement of labor laws, including worker classification.
Existing law exempts specified occupations and business relationships from the application of the ABC test described above. Existing law, instead, provides that these exempt relationships are governed by the multifactor test previously adopted in the case of S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d.
This bill would extend the above-specified exemption to a sports coach for an elementary or secondary private school or local educational agency, as prescribed, and would define terms, including "sports coach," for these purposes.
Text versions
- 01/05/26 - Amended Senate· Jan 5, 2026
- 04/07/25 - Amended Senate· Apr 7, 2025
- 02/20/25 - Introduced· Feb 20, 2025
- SB527
Roll-call votes
No recorded votes on this bill.
Actions
- Feb 2, 2026 · Senate
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. - Jan 13, 2026 · Senate
January 14 set for second hearing canceled at the request of author. - Jan 6, 2026 · Senate
Set for hearing January 14. - Jan 5, 2026 · Senate
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R. - Apr 29, 2025 · Senate
April 30 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author. - Apr 11, 2025 · Senate
Set for hearing April 30. - Apr 7, 2025 · Senate
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R. - Mar 5, 2025 · Senate
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R. - Feb 21, 2025 · Senate
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23. - Feb 20, 2025 · Senate
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.