California bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
California AB 358
Criminal procedure: privacy.
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became law
Sponsors
- Alvarez (Democratic)
Cosponsors (1)
- Macedo (Republican)
Summary
Official abstract published by the California legislature· summary
Existing law, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, prohibits a government entity from compelling the production of, or access to, electronic communication information or electronic device information, as defined, without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or subpoena issued pursuant to specified conditions. Existing law authorizes a government entity to access electronic device information by means of physical interaction or electronic communication with the device in certain circumstances, including, pursuant to the specific consent of the authorized possessor of the device or if the government entity, in good faith, believes that an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to a person requires access to the information. Existing law requires a government entity that obtains electronic information pursuant to an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to a person, within 3 court days after obtaining the electronic information, to file with the appropriate court an application for a warrant or order setting forth the facts giving rise to the emergency. Existing law requires the court to promptly rule on the application and to destroy all information obtained upon a finding that the facts did not give rise to an emergency or upon rejecting the application on any other ground.
This bill would additionally authorize a government entity to access electronic device information with the specific consent of an individual who locates a tracking or surveillance device, as defined, and the device is reasonably believed to have been used to track or record the individual without their permission. The bill would require a government entity that obtains information through this method, within 3 court days after obtaining the electronic information, to follow the above process for applying for a warrant or order from a court by setting forth the facts that describe the circumstances and would require the court to promptly rule on the application and order the immediate destruction of all information obtained upon a finding that the facts were not as described.
Existing law authorizes an individual whose information is targeted by a warrant, order, or other legal process, or other specified recipients of a warrant, that is inconsistent with the act or the California or United States Constitution, to petition the issuing court to void or modify the warrant, order, or process, or to order the destruction of any information obtained in violation of the act or the California or United States Constitution.
This bill would recast the provisions described above to authorize an individual whose information is sought or obtained by a government entity in a manner that is inconsistent with the act or the California or United States Constitution, or other specified recipients of a warrant, order, legal process, request, or demand seeking the individual's information, to petition a court to void or modify the warrant, order, other legal process, request, or demand to order the destruction of the information.
Text versions
- 06/25/25 - Amended Senate· Jun 25, 2025
- 04/10/25 - Amended Assembly· Apr 10, 2025
- 03/18/25 - Amended Assembly· Mar 18, 2025
- 01/30/25 - Introduced· Jan 30, 2025
- AB358
Roll-call votes
State vote data last updated Oct 16, 2026, 8:07 AM.
| Date | Vote | Result | Your legislators |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2025 Senate | Placed on suspense file | pass | Set your home in California to see |
| Jun 24, 2025 Senate | Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] | pass | Set your home in California to see |
| May 15, 2025 House | AB 358 Alvarez Assembly Third Reading | pass | Set your home in California to see |
| Apr 30, 2025 House | Do pass. | pass | Set your home in California to see |
| Apr 22, 2025 House | Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] | pass | Set your home in California to see |
| Mar 11, 2025 House | Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection] | pass | Set your home in California to see |
Actions
- Aug 29, 2025 · Senate
In committee: Held under submission. - Jul 7, 2025 · Senate
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file. - Jun 25, 2025 · Senate
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. - Jun 24, 2025 · Senate
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 24). - May 28, 2025 · Senate
Referred to Com. on PUB. S. - May 15, 2025 · Senate
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. - May 15, 2025 · House
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 1. Page 1556.) - May 1, 2025 · House
Read second time. Ordered to third reading. - Apr 30, 2025 · House
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 30). - Apr 23, 2025 · House
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. - Apr 23, 2025 · House
Coauthors revised. - Apr 21, 2025 · House
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. - Apr 10, 2025 · House
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended. - Mar 21, 2025 · House
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. - Mar 19, 2025 · House
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P. - Mar 18, 2025 · House
Read second time and amended. - Mar 17, 2025 · House
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 11). - Feb 18, 2025 · House
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and P. & C.P. - Jan 31, 2025 · House
From printer. May be heard in committee March 2. - Jan 30, 2025 · House
Read first time. To print.