WatchGov

California bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

California AB 1664

Elections: law enforcement investigations of election records or voting technology.

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed House
  4. Passed Senate
  5. To Governor
  6. Became law

Sponsors

Cosponsors (3)

Summary

Official abstract published by the California legislature· summary

The Secretary of State is the chief elections officer of the state, and the Attorney General is the chief law officer of the state. Existing law requires a state or local agency that files or is served with an elections-related claim arising under federal law to provide written notice to the Secretary of State and the Attorney General within 3 court days. Existing law requires a state or local agency that intends to enter into a settlement, consent decree, or other court-approved agreement related to the claim to provide a draft copy of the settlement, consent decree, or agreement to the Secretary of State and the Attorney General at least 14 court days before entering into it. This bill would require a local agency, political subdivision, or elections official to provide notice to the Secretary of State and the Attorney General immediately, but no later than one calendar day, after becoming aware of any warrant, subpoena, or active law enforcement investigation pertaining to any election records or certified voting technology under their custody or control. The bill would authorize the Secretary of State or the Attorney General to intervene in, or initiate, any court proceedings to challenge a warrant or subpoena on any valid grounds or seek any other appropriate relief. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2030. By increasing the duties of local elections officials, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Text versions

Roll-call votes

State vote data last updated Oct 15, 2026, 4:08 AM.

DateVoteResultYour legislators
Aug 26, 2026
House
AB 1664 Jackson Concurrence in Senate AmendmentspassSet your home in California to see
Aug 25, 2026
Senate
3rd Reading AB1664 Jackson et al. By Wiener Urgency ClausepassSet your home in California to see
Aug 13, 2026
Senate
Do pass as amendedpassSet your home in California to see
Aug 13, 2026
Senate
[08-13-2026] set for [First] hearing: Reconsideration of favorable vote grantedpassSet your home in California to see
Aug 13, 2026
Senate
Do pass as amendedpassSet your home in California to see
Aug 3, 2026
Senate
Placed on suspense filepassSet your home in California to see
Jun 30, 2026
Senate
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]passSet your home in California to see
Jun 16, 2026
Senate
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]passSet your home in California to see
May 21, 2026
House
AB 1664 Jackson Third Reading UrgencypassSet your home in California to see
May 6, 2026
House
Do pass as amended.passSet your home in California to see
Apr 15, 2026
House
Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]passSet your home in California to see

Actions