119th Congress
S. 1495
NRCS Wetland Compliance and Appeals Reform Act
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- To President
- Became law
- Sponsor
- Mike Rounds(R-SD)
- Introduced
- Apr 10, 2025
- Policy area
- Agriculture and Food
- Committees
- Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
- Official text
- Introduced in Senate · Congress.gov page
Cosponsors (2)
Original cosponsors (2)
- John Hoeven (R-ND)
- Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
Summary
Summary by the Congressional Research Service· describes the “Introduced in Senate” version
NRCS Wetland Compliance and Appeals Reform Act
This bill revises provisions related to compliance and the appeals process for the wetland certification program at the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
Among other things, this bill
• prohibits the NRCS from acquiring any permanent easement;
• prohibits the Department of Agriculture (USDA) from imposing penalties retroactively for newly determined wetlands;
• revises the appeals process of the NRCS for wetland certification requests;
• prohibits USDA from using new rationale for a wetland determination if a person has previously successfully appealed a final wetland determination;
• establishes that USDA bears the burden of proof, by clear and convincing evidence, that a person has violated certain wetland conservation provisions;
• requires USDA to establish oversight committees in each state that will oversee the appeals of wetland determinations; and
• requires that each individual who interacts with the NRCS have the option to participate in a customer satisfaction survey provided by an independent survey company.
In addition, USDA must modify the appeals process to provide the person appealing with certain USDA records or documentation relating to the compliance violations.
Further, in an appeal that is related to a delineation, determination, or certification of a wetland, USDA must modify the process to (1) allow a person to call NRCS technical staff as a witness, (2) accept evidence provided by the person bringing the appeal as reliable absent substantial evidence that it is not reliable, and (3) compensate a person who successfully appeals for fees and expenses.
Roll-call votes
No recorded votes on this bill.
Actions
- Apr 10, 2025 · Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. - Apr 10, 2025
Introduced in Senate