119th Congress
H.R. 6048
NDO Fairness Act of 2025
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became law
- Sponsor
- Scott Fitzgerald(R-WI)
- Introduced
- Nov 17, 2025
- Policy area
- Crime and Law Enforcement
- Committees
- House Committee on the Judiciary; Senate Committee on the Judiciary
- Official text
- Referred in Senate · Congress.gov page
Cosponsors (1)
Original cosponsors (1)
- Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Summary
Summary by the Congressional Research Service· describes the “Introduced in House” version
NDO Fairness Act
This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).
The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.
This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.
The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.
Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Roll-call votes
No recorded votes on this bill.
Actions
- Sep 14, 2026 · Senate
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. - Aug 31, 2026 · House
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. - Aug 31, 2026 · House
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267) - Aug 31, 2026
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. - Aug 31, 2026 · House
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048. - Aug 31, 2026 · House
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5266-5268) - Aug 31, 2026 · House
Mr. Fitzgerald moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended. - Nov 20, 2025
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote. - Nov 20, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held - Nov 18, 2025
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held - Nov 17, 2025 · House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. - Nov 17, 2025
Introduced in House