119th Congress
H.J.Res. 139
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring a balanced budget for the Federal Government.
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became law
- Sponsor
- Andy Biggs(R-AZ)
- Introduced
- Jan 9, 2026
- Policy area
- Economics and Public Finance
- Committees
- House Committee on the Judiciary
- Official text
- Reported in House · Congress.gov page
Cosponsors (2)
Added later (2)
- Andrew S. Clyde (R-GA) · Jan 12, 2026
- Josh Brecheen (R-OK) · Jan 13, 2026
Summary
Summary by the Congressional Research Service· describes the “Reported to House” version
This joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment prohibiting total federal expenditures for a year from exceeding the average annual federal receipts collected in the three prior years, adjusted for changes in the population of U.S. citizens and inflation. Expenditures for payment of debt and receipts derived from borrowing are excluded.
Under the amendment, Congress may authorize specific expenditures in excess of the limit with (1) a roll call vote of two-thirds of each chamber, or (2) a roll call vote for any year in which a declaration of war is in effect.
The amendment also prohibits any bill to levy a new tax or increase the rate of any tax from becoming law unless it has been approved by a roll call vote of two-thirds of the whole number of each chamber of Congress.
The requirements take effect in the fifth year beginning after ratification of the amendment.
Roll-call votes
| Date | Vote | Result | Your members |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 House #95 | On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring a balanced budget for the Federal Government | Failed | Set your home to see |
Actions
- Mar 18, 2026 · House
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 211 - 207 (Roll no. 95). - Mar 18, 2026
Failed of passage/not agreed to in House On motion to suspend the rules and pass the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 211 - 207 (Roll no. 95). - Mar 18, 2026 · House
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2583-2584) - Mar 18, 2026 · House
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed. - Mar 18, 2026 · House
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1115, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 139 - Mar 18, 2026 · House
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2560-2568; text: CR H2560-2561) - Mar 18, 2026 · House
Mr. Biggs (AZ) moved to suspend the rules and pass the resolution. - Feb 25, 2026 · House
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 63. - Feb 25, 2026 · House
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-520. - Feb 3, 2026
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 10. - Feb 3, 2026
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held - Jan 9, 2026 · House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. - Jan 9, 2026
Introduced in House